Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:04

Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Here’s what everyone should know about this new HIV prevention shot - The Washington Post
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Poland election: Conservative historian Nawrocki wins presidential vote - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Astronomers Just Discovered The Biggest Explosions Since The Big Bang - ScienceAlert
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Why is the United States urging restraint from Israel in its conflict with Hezbollah?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Drug deaths plummet among young Americans as fentanyl carnage eases - NPR
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are the latest developments in the tech industry?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Rikishi calls for WWE writers to be fired for botching Jey Uso’s world title run - Cageside Seats
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?